• Home
  • The Book
  • The Author
  • Events
  • The Blog
  • Failures Within
  • Contact

Seek to Misconstrue   + a

Failure: The Blog  

October 2012

  • 'Goldeneye' Creators Had Almost No Experience
  • Flushing Away an Enormous Problem
  • The Little Lie About the Biggest Mountain
  • You Should Unfriend 10 People on Facebook
  • Inventor of Most Popular Guitar Could Not Play Guitar
  • TV Show Star And High School Dropout

September 2012

  • In Praise of Mediocrity
  • The Failure to Patent a Billion Dollar Formula
  • This Bus Stop is a Fake
  • [VIDEO] A Hollywood Camera Move Made From Junk
  • Productivity Through Self Denial?
  • Harvard Business Review: Get Ready to Fail

August 2012

  • The Innovative Power of Lying
  • [VIDEO] You're Not That Great
  • The Failure of a Great Singer
  • James Cameron was Homeless
  • Something Worse Than Failure
  • Jackie Chan and the Plan to Fail
  • On Failure and Baseball

July 2012

  • Failure on the Radio
  • Complaint Calls Can Be Useful
  • The Terribly Useful Terrible Movie
  • FedEx's Big Gamble (No, Really)
  • Positive Fail, Dot Com
  • How Boring Attire Wins

June 2012

  • [VIDEO] Failing to Success / Harvard Business Review
  • Sly Stallone's Failures
  • The Secret Purpose of Computer Solitaire

[More archives...]

« A Case For Failing
What’s in a Band Name »

The Upside of Being Dishonest

April 11th, 2012 - Leave a comment »

Failure should be avoided, right? So why is sometimes attractive to be dishonest? And what does telling lies say about our personality?

These are some of the questions raised by a new article in Businessweek called Are Creative People More Dishonest?. Journalist Caroline Winter writes:

“We found a positive correlation,” says [researcher] Gino. “The more creativity required on the job, the more unethical behavior was self-reported.” Note: Subsequent studies seem to indicate that these findings weren’t simply a result of more honest reporting on the part of creative employees.

This isn’t to say that graphic designers are necessarily more dishonest than, say, accountants. Creative types are simply “at a higher risk for behaving unethically because they can more easily find reasons why their behavior is not problematic,” says Gino. In other words, original thinkers aren’t more ethically depraved than the rest of us; they’re just better equipped to find ways of being dishonest without compromising their own self-regard.

unnamed

This might want to make you run out and lock the supply cabinet so that your artistic staff don’t rob you blind. But that shouldn’t be the message at all. The study doesn’t say anything at about self-control. Rather, it just says that creative people find ways to cheat that less creative folks don’t ever dream of.

The profound insight comes when you put these findings in reverse. If creative people are more dishonest because they can brainstrom a wider range of unsavory methodologies, perhaps you can become more creative by fantasizing about a life of crime. Isn’t this exactly what the world’s foremost law enforcement, military and security experts do every day? They have to dream up ways to break the system so they can defend against them.

Failure is the secret to success. If you want to expand your mind, think of ways to cheat. If you want to stop the flow of criminal activity, think like a criminal. Expect that you’ll have to at least entertain negative thoughts to find positive solutions. Doing something bad is often the only way to ensure that you can do something good.

Share on Twitter
Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email

Related Posts

No related posts.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 11th, 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


© Copyright 2009-2013 Robby Slaughter - All Rights Reserved • Theme from Web Considerations, LLC